Andreesseen manifesto just confirmed what I wrote about the guy BEFORE he published it:
clueless about what real parenting and human education are... extremely narrow-minded...just more of the same cult that's been screwing the world for years, now just faster
Hi, Virginia. If you are taking a deep dive into Progress Studies, you might want to take a look at my two books on the subject.: "From Poverty to Progress" and "Promoting Progress."
I have a little different take on the subject from most.
Not to quibble, but is dynamism a *form* of liberalism or a *spirit* of liberalism? I embrace it (as best I can) as the latter. That is, my guess is that a dynamist liberal would appreciate (with caveats) the insight of Spencer Tracy’s highly memorable closing argument before an early twentieth-century jury deliberating on the value of progress in *Inherit the Wind*: Yes, “you can have a telephone but you lose privacy and the charm of distance”; “you may conquer the air but the birds will lose their wonder and the clouds will smell like gasoline.” Statist-minded liberals, on the other hand, tend to reject unknown trade-offs with alarm, even after consuming the material benefits of that dynamism. No?
Andreesseen manifesto just confirmed what I wrote about the guy BEFORE he published it:
clueless about what real parenting and human education are... extremely narrow-minded...just more of the same cult that's been screwing the world for years, now just faster
From here: https://mfioretti.substack.com/p/taking-ai-too-seriously-is-not-intelligent
Hi, Virginia. If you are taking a deep dive into Progress Studies, you might want to take a look at my two books on the subject.: "From Poverty to Progress" and "Promoting Progress."
I have a little different take on the subject from most.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B09XKZDRRW?ref_=dbs_p_pwh_rwt_anx_b_lnk&storeType=ebooks
Thank you Virginia. Terrific.
Not to quibble, but is dynamism a *form* of liberalism or a *spirit* of liberalism? I embrace it (as best I can) as the latter. That is, my guess is that a dynamist liberal would appreciate (with caveats) the insight of Spencer Tracy’s highly memorable closing argument before an early twentieth-century jury deliberating on the value of progress in *Inherit the Wind*: Yes, “you can have a telephone but you lose privacy and the charm of distance”; “you may conquer the air but the birds will lose their wonder and the clouds will smell like gasoline.” Statist-minded liberals, on the other hand, tend to reject unknown trade-offs with alarm, even after consuming the material benefits of that dynamism. No?